Don't Average During Planning Poker

I like to use Planning Poker to estimate the user stories on an agile team's product backlog. In this approach individual estimators hold up cards showing their estimates. If estimators disagree they discuss why, ask questions of their product owner (who should be present), and repeat until they come to consensus.

Team members often ask me whether they really need to come to consensus or whether they can just take the mean of the individual estimates. The problem with averaging is that it is too easy--rather than have the fierce discussion that is one of the huge benefits of playing Planning Poker teams fall into a trap of playing one or two rounds and then just averaging.

An obvious dysfunction is that one estimator may play the 100 card not because he thinks it will take that long but because he thinks 20 is the right number and other estimators are thinking 8 and 13. For this reason and others, if a team truly feels compelled to average, they should take the median (middle value) rather than the mean (sum of estimates divided by number of estimates). A lot of dark corners are enlightened through the discussion; teams lose out on that when they average.

So while I want teams to come to agreement, I don't care how heartfelt the agreement is. If we agree on 13 some of us may really believe that's the right number. Others may think 8 is right but that 13 is "close enough." Still others may think we've discussed the item too long and even though it should be a 20 will give in and call it a 13 just to be done with it. So, rather than average if the team is an impasse I suggest going another round. If still stuck, someone should suggest a reasonable number and see if everyone can "support it" rather than "think it's the absolutely perfect number."

Guide

Planning Poker

Featured

Planning Poker is a collaborative technique agile teams use to estimate product backlog items. It works because it combines independent thinking with team discussion.

Agile Estimating and Planning Chapters
Download

Agile Estimating and Planning Chapters

Featured

Read sample chapters from Mike Cohn's Agile Estimating and Planning and explore practical guidance for estimating, planning, and forecasting agile work. Please provide your name and email and we’ll send you the…

A folding ruler sits inside a circle, upon which rotate planning poker cards, gears, and a clock. Text to the right of the image reads, Story Points are an Estimate of Effort, as Influenced by the amount of work, complexity, risk and uncertainty.
Article

What Are Agile Story Points?

Featured

Understand what story points measure and why they are often misunderstood.

Text graphic: Estimate at the right time and level of detail.
Article

When Should We Estimate the Product Backlog

Estimate backlog items at the right time and level of detail.

Article artwork for Don’t Equate Story Points to Hours.
Article

Don’t Equate Story Points to Hours

Story points are about time, specifically effort. But that does not mean you should say, “One story point = eight hours.

Article artwork for 3 Roles That Need to be Involved in Agile Estimating with Planning Poker.
Article

3 Roles That Need to be Involved in Agile Estimating with Planning Poker

Clarify who should be in Planning Poker so estimates include the right knowledge.